Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
