Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 270g / 9,52oz and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
