Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
71.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.6 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
