Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
71.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a durability of 5.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
