Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
71.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a weight of 520g / 18,34oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
