Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Saltiga
Seafishing
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.83 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €777.77
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Saltiga and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
