Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G)
Spinning
77.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeFC 2000-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 170g / 6oz and a ergonomics of 6.43 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
