Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank60 centimeter / 23.62 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
