Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT , 1000 S-P, left and right hand, Forellen Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10180-100
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank60 centimeter / 23.62 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €94.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size1000 S-P
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100
Shimano AERO XR, C5000, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, AEROXRC5000
Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €125.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC5000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Conclusion

Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT and Shimano AERO XR?

Shimano AERO XR C5000X

  • This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios