Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €97.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
