Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €319.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (145g / 5,12oz) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.03 out of 10 (145g / 5,12oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
