Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €319.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
