Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
79.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €324.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.91 out of 10) and durability (5.52 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X
Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX