Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
79.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €324.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and total score (7.91 out of 10). While Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
