Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
79.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €324.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX
