Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
79.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €324.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
