Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
79.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €324.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.91 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
