Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
91.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €344.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.15 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin SHARX 6000X
