Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
91.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €344.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.15 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
