Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €329.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (8.77 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
