Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €329.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (170g / 6oz) and the line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
