Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
88.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.32 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €334.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (8.8 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.32 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
