Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
88.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.32 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €334.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (8.8 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.32 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
