Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
88.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.32 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €334.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Spinning
37.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag3.0 kg - 6.6 lbs
Weight355 g - 12.5oz
Line retireve per crank86 cm / 33.9 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25-260 / 0.30-180 / 0.35-130 / 0.40-100 lb/yds: 8-240 / 10-200 / 12-160
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Super 4000 GT RD, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (8.8 out of 10). While Shimano Super 4000 GT RD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Shimano Super 4000 GT RD?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
