Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT, 5000S-CP, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, 10317-500
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT
Feeder And Match
94.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €177.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000S-CP
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 4000-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-401
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €98.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.4 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables