Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT

Spinning

56.60 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight195g / 6878oz

Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26772 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €62.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Stella FK

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch

Ball bearings12+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €599.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 M
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Conclusion

Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX clearly outshines Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Shimano Stella FK?

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X

Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX

8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.