Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7584oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29528 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €64.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
