Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31496 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
