Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32283 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
