Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
83.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €471.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.38 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32283 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
