Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
