Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT

Spinning

65.30 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €70.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano AERO XR

Feeder And Match

81.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.2 out of 10

Gear ratio5

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight210g / 7.41oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €114.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.1 out of 10) and the ball bearings (5+1). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32283 inch and a ergonomics of 6.27 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.