Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH, 1000D-XH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10116-107
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH
Spinning
1000d-xhx
64.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.32 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €71.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size1000D-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT, 2000 S-H, left and right hand, Forellen Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10307-200
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €199.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000 S-H
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8 out of 10) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.32 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables