Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH, 2000D-XH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10116-207
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH
Spinning
2000d-xhx
64.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €73.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000D-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Shimano AERO XR, 4000, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, AEROXR4000
Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €121.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Conclusion

Shimano AERO XR 4000X edges out Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the total score (7.83 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 81 centimeter / 31.89 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH and Shimano AERO XR?

There are not much differences between the two comparables