Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH
Spinning
2500d-xhx
72.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a durability of 5.89 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,06oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
