Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH

Spinning

3000d-cxhx

72.80 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €76.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight195g / 6.88oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 S-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.44 out of 10) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.