Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH, 4000D-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10116-407
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH
Spinning
4000d-cxhx
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €79.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT, 5000S-CP, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, 10317-500
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT
Feeder And Match
94.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €177.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000S-CP
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX clearly outshines Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.5 out of 10) and total score (9.4 out of 10). While Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH and Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables