Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH, 4000D-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10116-407
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH
Spinning
4000d-cxhx
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €79.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH, 3000D-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10116-307
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH
Spinning
3000d-cxhx
72.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €76.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000D-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX and Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, while Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX stands out for a weight of 205g / 7,23oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH and Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH?

There are not much differences between the two comparables