Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH
Spinning
4000d-cxhx
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a durability of 5.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
