Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH, 4000D-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10116-407
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH
Spinning
4000d-cxhx
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €79.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Shimano AERO XR, C5000, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, AEROXRC5000
Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €125.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC5000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a total score of 7.92 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH and Shimano AERO XR?

There are not much differences between the two comparables