Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L, 15, left hand, Slow-Jigging Fishing Reel, Star Drag, 10808-015
Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
Multireels
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight485g / 17108oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40551 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €499.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size15
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeStar drag
  • Handle orientationLeft
  • Line capacity monofil-
Shimano Talica 20II CAM, 2-Speed, right hand, Multi fishing reel, TAC20IICAM
Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €499.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size20II CAM
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeLever drag
  • Handle orientationRight
  • Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L and Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L offers a weight of 485g / 17108oz, while Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1 / 3.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L and Shimano Talica 20II CAM?

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L

  • Scoring 8.38 out of 10 (485g / 17108oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
  • Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX

  • Higher gear ratio of 5.2:1 / 3.1:1 (scoring 9.4 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count