Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX stands out for a weight of 195g / 6,88oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
