Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX stands out for a weight of 170g / 6oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (8), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
