Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
