Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
54.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.02 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight295g / 10.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and ball bearings (8). While Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
- With a score like 8.03 out of 10 (295g / 10,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
