Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
