Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
