Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX stands out for a weight of 180g / 6,35oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Shimano Exsence?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (8), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
