Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
