Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
