Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX stands out for a weight of 215g / 7,58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
